| Action Involved |
Violations of Statutory Law |
Violation of Human Rights:
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights |
Other Violations |
| 1.The Australian Government
failed to protect Mr Vescio's rights when his company was
liquidated although being not insolvent |
* Corporation Law
* Contract Law
* Criminal Law |
* Article 26 |
* Violation of basic
democratic principles |
| 2.Australian courts ordered
the stripping of all of Mr Vescio assets for alleged company
debts. |
* Corporation Law |
* Article 26 |
* Violation of basic
democratic principles |
| 3. No law protected the
assets and livelihood of Michael Vescio from being distributed
amongst banks, finance companies and money lending bodies for a
fraction of their value. |
* Criminal Law
* Bankruptcy Law |
* Article 26 |
* Violation of basic
democratic principles |
| 4. Courts ordered that the
liquidator take possession of Mr Vescio's assets whilst the
litigation was not finalised. Mr Vescio consequently lost his
income. As a bankrupt he cannot defend the unlawful asset
stripping and company liquidation. |
* Bankruptcy Law
* Corporation Law |
* Article 2
* Article 14
* Article 26 |
* Violation of basic
democratic principles |
5. Mr Vescio's interests
were not protected by law when the lender/solicitor defaulted his
contractual agreement to pay out the loan and by that caused the
bankruptcy.
|
* Criminal Law
* Contract Law
* Bankruptcy Law |
* Article 26 |
* Violation of basic
democratic principles |
| 6. The Australian Government
refused to investigate fraud and other criminal offences alleged
against banks, the lender/solicitor, financial advisor and
administrator although the financial advisor and lender/solicitor
may have bankrupted Mr Vescio in order to get his assets for a
fraction of their value. |
* Criminal Law
* Contract Law
* Bankruptcy Law
|
* Article 26 |
* Violation of basic
democratic principles |
