Action Involved |
Violations of Statutory Law |
Violation of Human Rights:
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights |
Other Violations |
1. The Australian Government
failed to protect Mr Wilson's rights established by law under the
States Rural Reconstruction Act 1971 and the Rural Adjustment Act
1985. |
* States Rural Reconstruction
Act 1971 and the Rural Adjustment Act 1985 |
* Article 26 |
* Violation of basic
democratic principles |
2. The Australian Government
failed in its authority to ensure that the Rural Finance
Corporation complied with its obligation under the Act. |
* States Rural Reconstruction
Act 1971 and the Rural Adjustment Act 1985 |
* Article 26 |
* Violation of basic
democratic principles |
3. Australian Government
failed in its authority over the Rural Finance Corporation when
it discriminated against Mr Wilson by its refusal to assist and
by that breached its obligation under the Act |
* States Rural Reconstruction
Act 1971 and the Rural Adjustment Act 1985 |
* Article 2
* Article 26 |
* Violation of basic
democratic principles |
4. The Australian courts
have treated Mr Wilson's attempts to defend his rights with
contempt |
*
* |
* Article 2
* Article 14
* Article 26 |
* Violation of basic
democratic principles |
5. The Australian Government
did not intervene when the courts dispossessed the Wilson family.
As a result the Wilson family is unable to defend their
rights. |
*
* |
* Article 2
* Article 14
* Article 26 |
* Violation of basic
democratic principles |
6. The Australian Government
refused to protect Mr Wilson's rights, accepted a miscarriage of
justice and refused him an effective remedy for the wrong he has
suffered. Mr Wilson's case is one of many cases made known to the
Federal Government during debate in the Senate. The debate made
it clear that Mr Wilson's case is typical of what is happening in
rural Australia and that the asset-stripping of farmers is
destroying lives and many families. |
|
* Article 2
* Article 26
|
* Violation of basic
democratic principles |