|
|
|
Mr A. W. Keam. 14 January, 2001 David B. Wilson , Manager, Operations, Reference: HHLCI-00-250 Dear Mr Wilson, I refer to your letter dated 21 December 2000, in which you apologise for any inconvenience caused due to the failure of your staff and others for issuing a summons that had no meaning, but what I did not see or receive were the documents that I requested that unequivocally demonstrate that what actions you are taking are in fact legal. There is also no mention of any penalties being applied to those who perpetrated this hennas act. But I am not surprised that that those involved where not punished in any way. Your actions would indicate that you hold that the South Australian Governor has the Authority to carry out his duties but you refuse or are unable to produce his "Writ of Commission" duly Signed, Sealed and Dated, which would verify his authority. You are obviously ignoring the fact that I and the Holden Hill Magistrates Court have a copy of a letter from the Office of the Governor that clearly states that his "Writ of Commission" is not Signed, Sealed or Dated as required. The situation is that since Dean Brown (MP) failed in his duty to secure the document that is required for the Governor to carry out his duties lawfully, he has without basis in law carried on as if nothing was out of place. This could be construed as a serious corruption within both the Government and Legal system. A corruption that commences at the very top. Many people would believe that the courts, through the separation of powers, were there to keep a check on the Government and invalidate any legislation that was inconsistent with the power bestowed on the Government under the Constitution but it is obvious that this is not happening. The courts give the impression that they interpret law depending on how they feel on the day, to the detriment of those who stand before them. I once again ask for a copy of the following documents that I have repeatedly requested for and as yet have not received. 1) Your source of power; as written and approved by ALL the people of the Commonwealth of Australia. Since the High Court of Australia has established that International Treaty overrides municipal, national, domestic, statute, civil or colonial law in the "Teoh Case of 1994", and established that the United Kingdom of Great Britain was a "Foreign Power" in the "Robert Wood Case of 1988"; and you continue to refuse to supply me with any documented evidence which establishes your:- 1) Source of power; I refer you to the requirement under International Law whereby ANY court official, judge, magistrate, law officer, police officer, or their agents must be able to produce ALL of the above on demand. As you have failed to produce ALL of the above that we have already asked for on a number of occasions (not unfairly we think). We now ask that you produce:- 1) Written permission from the United Nations to use Foreign Law in the contravention of Article 2: paragraphs 1 and 4. Of the United Nations Charter 1945; 2) Written permission from the League of nations to use Foreign Law in contravention of Articles 1, X and XX; of the League of Nations Covenant of 1919; and assented to by the United nations as being allowed to continue at International Law after the establishment and signing of the United Nations Charter by the various Independent member States; 3) Permission, in writing, from the United Kingdom of Great Britain Parliament to continue the use of United Kingdom of Great Britain Law in the Independent Sovereign Nation of the Commonwealth of Australia; assented to and duly signed and sealed by the Royal Monarch of the United Kingdom of great Britain; in contravention of the United Kingdom of Great Britain Law, and International Law, after January 10, 1920. 4) Clear written evidence of the freely expressed permission by the people of Australia, for the continued use of foreign Colonial Law, within the Commonwealth of Australia, after January 10, 1920; when clearly ALL Foreign Law (Colonial or Otherwise) was deemed to be abrogated (Null and Void) at International Law under the terms of the League of Nations Covenant (Australia and Great Britain were original signatories). Under International Law any judge, magistrate, judicial officer, police officer, public servant or their agents imposing penalties under invalid laws without the legal authority outlined above, does so as a private individual and personally assumes all responsibility, including repayment from their private assets, of any monies collected or any damages or reparation later sought. If any person is imprisoned under these invalid laws, the officers imposing that imprisonment are in breach of the Geneva Convention number IV. To impose British Colonial Law within the Commonwealth of Australia is a breach of the 1947 Geneva Convention number IV; and as such fits snugly within the definition of a "War Crime" under that Convention. The penalties prescribed under this section of the International Law include capital punishment, substantial prison sentences and the loss of all possessions, assets and monies. Since the office of south Australia is established and constituted under letters Patent issued in the name of Queen Elizabeth II in the sovereignty of the UK of Great Britain and Northern Ireland by the UK Government on the 14th Feb 1986 to come into effect at the same time as the Australia Acts. I require a copy of the "Writ of Commission" For Sir Eric Neal issued under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, prepared in the Office of Chancery, through the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland at Westminster England and signed by the Monarch on the throne in the High Court of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Parliament. As a person holding such a position, these documents must be readily available to you so they can be supplied on request. I point out that in law they are public documents. To date it has been plainly clear that you, Mr Wilson, and others are unable to supply the documents that I have requested and that they clearly do not exist. There maybe a chance that you are able to find them but I very much doubt it. If you cannot you need to be aware that Article 14 of "The International Covenant on Civil; and Political Human Rights", GUARANTEES that ALL legal proceedings MUST be before "A fair and public hearing by a COMPENTENT, INDEPENDENT and IMPARTIAL tribunal ESTABLISHED at LAW. The International Community realises that NONE of these requirements are available in Australia, so any action persued by you within Australia will be reversed by The International Criminal Tribunal, much to your discomfort. Particular attention should be taken of Session I and II (William and Mary) 1688, Re-establishment of the Throne of Great Britain and Ireland in the High Court of the Parliament at Westminster. (Neither of which can be Amended, Abridged or Abrogated whatsoever for Evermore). The re-establishment of the Monarch under these two sessions of the parliament clearly define the Monarch as an integral part of the British Government. As you have failed in the past to produce the documents, and if I have not received the above requested documents to my complete satisfaction then once again it shall be deemed that none exist and that you are acting as an individual without any Source of Power, Authority, Jurisdiction or Head of Power. This will be taken that you and all those involve with you are committing a War Crime (enforcement of foreign law within an independent sovereign nation), of which, if convicted, the penalties are very severe indeed. These requests must be becoming monotonous, but ALL it takes is for you and others to produce the documents requested to my complete satisfaction and this matter will be immediately settled. Pleased be assured that all your actions and the actions of others in this matter as well as the correspondence related to this matter, have been passed onto the relevant United Nations departments. Should you ultimately decide to issue a warrant for my arrest, then unlike the summons my full name should appear on it so that you are not involved in another and more seriously embarrassing oversight and have yourself and others involved in a wrongful arrest suit. You should be well aware by now that there are two (2) A W Keam's residing at this address. It is imperative that you inform "Her Majesty's Servants " that you instruct to execute the said warrant be fully informed of their obligations under the Charter of the United Nations and relevant Treaties as well as exactly what crimes that they will committing should they trespass on my property without my express written permission. As I have previously stated, I will protect my family, my property and myself under Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations. If they do not have in their possession the documents that I have requested, their presence on my property will be taken as an Act of Aggression from the enforcement of Foreign Laws (ie. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) in the Independent, Sovereign and Federal Nation of the Commonwealth of Australia. (Australia Act 1986, section 10.) Please be advised that your name has been entered in the ever increasing data base being complied for those who continually and knowingly enforce Foreign Laws within the Sovereign, Independent and Federal Nation of Australia. I pray to God that you and others have the common sense to supply the requested documents or desist in you wearisome invalid pursuit of my person.. May God have mercy on your soul. The attached document is a letter drop that I will distributing around my local area to enlighten the people to what extent the system will go to secure a conviction and continue to hide the truth, as you have to date been unable to produce any document to show what I have said to be incorrect. Regards, Alan W. Keam Without Prejudice. CC:All major Australian Newspapers;Washington Post;New York Times;United Nations;One Voice-One People The letter drop flyer
|